MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414710173 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105580

2MO Personalised therapy in CUP: A feasibility study of Bayesian AI digital twins using ctDNA

2025· article· en· W4414710173 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew V. Biankin, Uzma Asghar, Nicole Cook, Kelly Warrington, K. Lighting-Jones, Bryan A. Plummer, E. Misirlioglu, Irina S. Babina, Martin Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian probabilityPrecision medicineMEDLINEBayesian inference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cancer cachexia impairs patient survival, marked by muscle wasting and metabolic disruption.Conventional muscle biopsies make continuous assessment and large-scale screening impractical.Blood DNA methylation profiles offer a promising non-invasive alternative, reflecting tissue-specific gene regulation patterns and enabling cross-tissue transcriptome prediction for cachexia risk assessment in cancer patients. Methods:We developed a Transformer-based deep learning framework to predict muscle tissue transcriptome expression from blood methylation data.Using multicentre database (15,606 samples), we trained a model integrating CpG site chromosomal position information and functional annotations.We employed GTEx database to develop a cross-tissue transcriptome prediction model using transfer and reinforcement learning strategies.The framework was applied to glioma patients' blood methylation data to predict virtual muscle transcriptome profiles.We analyzed similarity between predicted profiles and known cachexia transcriptomes using cosine similarity, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Manhattan distance metrics.Additionally, we integrated IDH mutation status data to assess its relationship with cachexia risk.Results: Our Transformer model achieved high accuracy in predicting gene expression from methylation data (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.89).The cross-tissue prediction model maintained robust performance when transferring to muscle tissue prediction (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.87).Importantly, IDH-wildtype gliomas showed significantly stronger association with abnormal expression of cachexia-related genes in predicted muscle transcriptomes compared to IDH-mutant tumors.Our CNN model for predicting the relationship between IDH mutation status and muscle gene expression patterns achieved 0.9733 accuracy. Conclusions:This study enables non-invasive monitoring of molecular changes in muscle tissue without requiring biopsies.This novel strategy offers a valuable tool for early prediction of cancer cachexia in glioma patients, with potential applications across multiple cancer types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207