Documentary Creation and Cultural Transmission of Shandong Clapper Ballad as Intangible Cultural Heritage from an Educational Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the preservation and educational transmission of Shandong Clapper Ballad, a nationally recognized intangible cultural heritage, through the medium of documentary filmmaking. Faced with declining participation—particularly among younger generations—under the pressures of globalization and modernization, the research evaluates how education-oriented documentaries can function simultaneously as a preservation tool and a pedagogical resource to enhance cultural literacy, foster aesthetic appreciation, and strengthen cultural identity. Using a mixed-methods approach that combines literature review, field investigation, and interviews with practitioners, educators, and cultural experts, the study provides a multidimensional analysis of the art form’s historical development, educational value, and contemporary challenges. Findings reveal that while traditional modes of transmission remain vital, integrating modern media with explicit educational design significantly improves audience engagement and learning outcomes. The documentary format, enriched with narrative scaffolding and contextual interpretation, effectively raises awareness, stimulates interest, and supports the art form’s incorporation into both formal curricula and community-based education. However, persistent barriers—such as limited funding, inadequate technical resources, and insufficient integration into education systems—highlight the need for strategies that blend media innovation with curriculum development, experiential learning, and digital dissemination. Ultimately, this research demonstrates that media-driven, education-centered approaches can transform traditional art forms from static cultural relics into dynamic, participatory learning resources capable of thriving in contemporary society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".