MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414715939 · doi:10.1016/j.emcon.2025.100583

Use of polyamide nanofiltration membranes with varied active layer chemistry for treating pharmaceuticals of emerging concern from saline water

2025· article· en· W4414715939 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Umair Baig, Hassan Younas, Shehzada Muhammad Sajid Jillani, Abdul Waheed, Isam H. Aljundi

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerging contaminants · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTaiwan Mouse ClinicPacific Salmon FoundationKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsNanofiltrationPolyamideMembranePermeationPollutantSaline waterContact angleWater treatment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent emergence of pollutants of concern in the water bodies is becoming a challenge for the water treatment community. In such a scenario, the deployment of the polyamide (PA) nanofiltration (NF) has proved to be a successful solution. Hence, the current study focused on applying a set of PA NF membranes for their potential to treat saline water containing organic pharmaceutical pollutants of emerging concern. The membranes have a varied active layer chemistry owing to the use of a set of aliphatic amines of varying chain lengths during interfacial polymerization. Five membranes, ranging from M1 to M5 [ M1 (2% w/v PIP + 0.15% w/v TMC), M2 (1.8% w/v PIP and 0.2% w/v EDA+ 0.15% w/v TMC), M3 (1.8% w/v PIP and 0.2% w/v DETA + 0.15% w/v TMC), M4 (1.8% w/v PIP and 0.2% w/v BAEP + 0.15% w/v TMC), and M5 (1.8% w/v PIP and 0.2% w/v TEPA+ 0.15% w/v TMC)], were fabricated, exhibiting varied physical and chemical features, including different surface charges, roughness, and wettability. The M4 membrane was found to be the best-performing membrane for rejecting the majority of pharmaceutical pollutant drugs and having higher permeate flux compared to other membranes. The M4 membrane has an entirely different surface morphology of larger-sized PA globules observed in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of the M4 membrane. In addition, the M4 membrane possessed a hydrophilic surface with a water contact angle of 24.5°, resulting in higher clean water permeability compared to other membranes. It was observed that the rejection of the pharmaceutical pollutant drugs was mainly governed by size exclusion, augmented by the Donnan effect, where the positively charged drugs were rejected almost entirely by the membranes. The M4 membrane rejected 66.9% of 4-hydroxyacetanilide, 82.0% of sulfamethoxazole, 96.9% of caffeine, and >99% of amitriptyline and ranolazine, where amitriptyline and ranolazine have positive charges. The presence of monovalent and divalent salts affected the rejection of the drugs, where the rejection of the drugs increased with increasing concentration of the salts. Moreover, the long-term stability tests revealed that the membranes exhibited stable rejection performance and a stable permeate flux, with only slight variations. The ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) analyses confirmed rejection of drugs from the water. This study demonstrated that variations in the chemistry of the PA active layer can yield promising membranes for removing organic pharmaceutical pollutants from saline water bodies, enabling safe reuse of treated water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerging contaminantsSame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207