MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414735422 · doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000001799

Torcular Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: A Retrospective Observational Study of Patient, Angiographic, and Treatment Characteristics

2025· article· en· W4414735422 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperative Neurosurgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbolizationPresentation (obstetrics)Retrospective cohort studyTransarterial embolizationObservational studyArteriovenous malformationCerebral angiographyArteriovenous fistula

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Torcular dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) are rare, often have an aggressive natural history, and present unique challenges because of complex vascular supply and involvement of bilateral venous sinuses. The study audits the authors' institutional experience treating patients with torcular dAVFs. METHODS: All patients with torcular dAVFs from January 2013 to July 2024 were included. Baseline patient and angioarchitecture characteristics were recorded, alongside treatment strategy. Functional outcome at last clinical follow-up was measured using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions assessed association between patient characteristics and dichotomized mRS. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (mean age 65 ± 17 years) were included; 53% were female. Most patients (88%) were symptomatic: 18% presented with hemorrhage, 47% with nonhemorrhagic global neurological deficit, and 24% with focal nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit. Most (14/17, 82%) had high-grade dAVFs (Borden II/III and Cognard IIb-IV). Endovascular embolization was used in 71%, whereas surgery was used in 12%. Angiographic cure was achieved in 63% of patients. Overall, 76% of patients had good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2). On univariate and multivariate analysis, both focal nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit ( P = .015) and baseline mRS ( P = .044) were associated with improved functional outcome. CONCLUSION: Borden II/Cognard 2A/B lesions are best treated by transarterial or combined transarterial/transvenous embolization, whereas Borden III/Cognard III/IV lesions are best treated by transarterial embolization or surgical disconnection. Transvenous approaches are reserved for lesions where the fistulous point is accessible. Patients with good functional status at presentation or focal neurological deficits improved after treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it