MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414737151 · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00795

Public Health Implications of Airborne <i>Candida</i>: Viability, Drug Resistance, and Genetic Links to Clinical Strains

2025· article· en· W4414737151 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chunlan Fan, Tian Chen, Franklin Wang‐Ngai Chow, Matthew C. Fisher, Matthias C. Rillig, Dong Wu, Yi Luo, Ling Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Ten Thousand Talent ProgramHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)Public healthAirborne transmissionCandida parapsilosisIsolation (microbiology)Phylogenetic treeAntifungalHazard

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Candida is the largest genus of medically significant yeasts, causing diseases ranging from mucosal to life-threatening invasive infections. Airborne transmission of Candida has gained attention following its genotypic detection in ambient air and isolation in occupational air. However, more comprehensive phenotypic evidence, including viability, antifungal resistance, and phylogenetic relatedness to clinical strains, is needed in ambient air, with implications for community-level exposure, colonization, and infection. To address this gap, we sampled air at an urban and a coastal site using six-stage Andersen impactors. Viable isolates of C. parapsilosis, C. albicans, and C. tropicalis ─all World Health Organization priority fungal pathogens─were recovered from ambient urban air, primarily associated with respirable particle sizes (2.1–7 μm) across seasons. Antifungal susceptibility testing identified C. parapsilosis as the predominant multidrug-resistant species. Whole-genome sequencing revealed airborne C. parapsilosis shared 99.53% genetic similarity with nearby clinical strains, differing by only 94 out of 20,206 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. This suggests the plausibility of community-acquired infection via airborne routes. These findings highlight the need to investigate airborne transmission from environmental reservoirs to human colonization and infection. This is particularly critical under urban megatrends and climate change, emphasizing an emerging microbial hazard beyond antibiotic-resistant bacteria within the One Health framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & Technology LettersSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207