MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414737935 · doi:10.1111/csp2.70163

Insights into the forests of Darién, Panama, from the new 10 ha <i>Bacurú Drõa</i> plot established through participatory methods within an Emberá territory

2025· article· en· W4414737935 on OpenAlexafffund
Maximiliane Jousse, Salomón Aguilar, Hector Barrios, Daisy H. Dent, Iran Dogirama, Homilia Flaco, Matthias Kunz, Joseph Levitan, Edison Degaiza, Wiyan Valdespino, David Mitre, E Mosquera, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Alexis Ortega, Rolando Pérez, Jorge Hernández Valdés, Juan Carlos Villarreal, Camilo Alejo, Catherine Potvin

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Science and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversité LavalMcGill University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaSmithsonian Tropical Research InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiodiversitySpecies richnessHectareRange (aeronautics)FloristicsPlot (graphics)TaxonVegetation (pathology)Basal area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Networks of forest plots are key for documenting how forests are responding to climate change; however, very few plots are in inaccessible locations, and almost no research is carried out in Indigenous territories. We present the first data from a new forest plot co‐developed with the Traditional Emberá Authorities of the Balsa River Collective Lands, Darién, Panama, following a framework of participatory action research: The Bacurú Drõa plot (In Emberá, “ Bacurú ” is tree and “ Drõa” is old, BD). We compare floristic characteristics and conservation status of trees in BD with those of 53 forest plots across Panama. In BD, trees with DBH ≥10 cm were classified in 290 taxonomic units, with 174 (60%) of taxa identified to species, 49 (17%) assigned to genera, and 22 (7.5%) to families, leaving 45 (15.5%) unidentified tree taxa. On a per hectare basis, stem density and species richness differed significantly among plots and groups of plots, both variables being highest in plots located in the Alto Chagres and lowest in the plots located along the Pacific. Estimates of species number for stem density in 1 ha, however, are significantly higher in BD. Conservation value, measured through community weighted mean (CWM) range and CWM International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) score, revealed BD to be of high conservation value when compared to the other ForestGEO plots in Panama. We show that BD has high biodiversity, many singletons, and many unidentified species, consistent with other plots in the Chocó‐Darién Ecoregion, an understudied global biodiversity hotspot. Overall, the Bacurú Drõa plot and surrounding project provide a blueprint on how tropical forest and participatory action research can value and benefit from the contribution of the Indigenous communities that live and conserve the vanishing mature forests of the world while providing sound scientific data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConservation Science and PracticeSame topicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207