MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414740571 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.436

B-038 Configuration and validation of urine citrate open channel assay on the Roche Cobas c503

2025· article· en· W4414740571 on OpenAlexaff
Chin‐Shan Lu, Mehdi Hooshmandi, Eric Liang, Fari Rokhforooz, Felix Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoche DiagnosticsUrineExternal quality assessmentCorrelation coefficientCitric acidReagentCoefficient of variationKidney stones

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Measuring urine citrate plays a key role in evaluating kidney stone risk and overall kidney health. Citrate in the urine helps prevent the formation of kidney stones, particularly calcium-based stones, by binding to calcium and reducing its availability to form crystals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of BEN Biomedical Enterprise citric acid quantitative assay configured on a Roche cobas c503. The validation followed Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. Methods Assay parameters were obtained from reagent instructions for use recommendations where available (BEN Biomedical Enterprise, REF: CI8820) and adjusted according to c503 instrument specifications. Reagent preparation was modified to minimize the wastage due to dead volume requirements on the Roche cobas development channel cartridges (Cat No. 08463140190). The assay parameters were configured using the Roche cobas development channel file creator software. Precision was evaluated by running 3 replicates of 2 quality controls (QC) daily across 5 days. Correlation studies were performed by comparing Roche cobas c503 results to Roche cobas c502 (N=40) using patient urine samples. Linearity was assessed using a series of samples made via mixing of a low and high patient pool that spanned the analytical measuring range. All patient samples were deidentified. Result Precision studies demonstrated acceptable performance with coefficient of variations of 5.34% and 1.86% for the low and high QC respectively. Correlation between the Roche cobas c502 and c503 was excellent (r=0.992, slope=1.06, intercept= -0.13 mmol/L). Linearity studies demonstrated a linear assay over a measured range of 0.04 – 12 mmol/L. Conclusion The BEN Biomedical Enterprise urine citric acid kit, configured on a Roche cobas c503, showed a robust performance and was found to be acceptable for use of patient testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207