MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414746122 · doi:10.1002/pmrj.70020

Ultrasonographic evaluation of ulnar innervated muscles in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

2025· article· en· W4414746122 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Ogalo, Christopher Doherty, Sean Bristol, Kristine Chapman, BC Neuromuscular Disease Group, Emily M. Krauss, Michael Berger

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElbowUlnar neuropathyEchogenicityUlnar nerveEntrapment NeuropathyUltrasonography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Quantitative muscle ultrasound (qMUS) provides morphological measurements that can support clinical observation of muscle atrophy and weakness. As the use of qMUS continues to expand, and its potential for broader implementation in neuromuscular evaluation grows, there is a clear need for further validation, particularly in pathologies frequently encountered in electrodiagnostic laboratories, such as cubital tunnel syndrome caused by ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of qMUS evaluation of ulnar-innervated intrinsic hand muscles. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals 18 years or older with chronic UNE and healthy controls (HC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: qMUS parameters (muscle thickness [MT], cross-sectional area [CSA], echogenicity) were measured in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and were correlated to corresponding negative peak amplitude of the compound muscle action potential measured (CMAP) and key pinch grip strength. RESULTS: Sixteen adults (8 HC, 8 UNE) participated in the study. Key pinch strength was significantly correlated with FDI MT (r = 0.45, p = .03 [95% CI, 0.05-0.73]) and echogenicity (rho = -0.60, p = .002 [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.24]). FDI MT and echogenicity explained 20% and 36% of pinch strength variance, respectively. Echogenicity was significantly correlated with corresponding CMAP amplitudes (FDI: rho = -0.59, p = .004 [95% CI, -0.81 to -0.21]; ADM: rho = -0.62, p = .002 [95% CI, -0.83 to -0.26]). No statistically significant relationship was found between key pinch strength and FDI CSA (r = 0.35 p = .104 [95% CI, -0.08-0.67]). Furthermore, FDI CMAP was not significantly associated with FDI MT (rho = 0.14, p = .55 [95% CI, -0.32-0.54]) or FDI CSA (rho = 0.041, p = .86 [95% CI, 0.04-0.47]). CONCLUSION: qMUS measures of echogenicity and MT (indicators of muscle fibrosis and size, respectively), correlated with key pinch strength and CMAP amplitudes in the FDI and ADM, in a heterogenous group including UNE and HC limbs. qMUS parameters may provide useful complementary markers and deeper insight into neuromuscular health in entrapment neuropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207