Nilai dan Makna Tarian Tebe Bei Mau pada Masyarakat Desa Kamanasa Kecamatan Malaka Tengah Kabupaten Malaka
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis is entitled "The Value and Meaning of the Tebe Bei Mau Dance in the Kamanasa Village Community, Malaka Tengah District, Malaka Regency" The purpose of this study is to determine the Value and Meaning of the Tebe Bei Mau Dance to find out the Kamanasa village community maintains the Value and Meaning of the Tebe Bei Mau Dance. Primary data is data from informants whose literature provides data through interviews. While secondary data is data obtained from those related to the research period. The data collection techniques used are interviews, observations and literature studies. The method used in this writing is a descriptive method. The methods used and collected are analyzed systematically, objectively, and comprehensively. The results of the study indicate that the Value and Meaning of the Tebe Bei Mau Dance in the Kamanasa Village Community, Malaka Tengah District, Malaka Regency highly upholds the Value and Meaning of the Tebe Bei Bau Dance, so the Kamanasa Village community has considered it a culture that has been passed down from generation to generation. The Tebe Bei Mau Dance in the Kamanasa Village Community is performed when before eating young corn. The Tebe Bei Mau dance is performed for three days and three nights. Efforts are made to preserve the Tebe Bei Bau dance. The Tebe Bei Bau dance is carried out in accordance with the norms that apply for three consecutive years set by the ancestors who guard it. the purity and implementation of Tebe Bei Mau even though it faces external cultural threats. And passing on the Tebe Bei Mau Dance to the younger generation and walking, it is mandatory for young men and women and girls to participate in every event of the Tebe Bei Mau Dance. Carrying out the Tebe Bei Mau Dance is the identity of the Kamanasa Village Community
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".