MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414753954 · doi:10.1037/cap0000444

Suicide prevention training within graduate psychology programs in Quebec, Canada: A quantitative and qualitative survey.

2025· article· en· W4414753954 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Julie Guindon, Michel Spodenkiewicz, Karina Béland, Sylvie Corbeil, Katia Dumont, Charles-Édouard Notredame, Rock-André Blondin, Myreille Bédard, Steven R. Shaw, Monique Séguin, Marie‐Claude Geoffroy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)Qualitative researchPoison controlSuicide preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Each year, over 700,000 individuals die by suicide worldwide. Both the Canada and Quebec National Suicide Prevention Strategies advocate suicide prevention training for all mental health professionals. We conducted a mixed-methods survey, qualitative and quantitative, to document the needs and barriers regarding suicide prevention training within Graduate Studies Programs in Psychology in Quebec, Canada, in 2023. Of the 27 programmes/streams in French or English institutions and accredited by the Quebec Order of Psychologists, 21 (78%) participated, represented by 12 programme or clinic directors with several years’ experience in their role. Semistructured interviews lasted 13–56 min (median 32 min); recordings were translated to English as necessary. We analyzed themes along four domains: suicide risk assessment and management, competing needs, challenges in providing training, and implementing standardized training. Of 21 participating programmes/streams, 19 (90%) provided training on suicide risk assessment and management. Representatives felt students were well prepared to assess suicide risk but less so to manage individuals contemplating suicide (interventions, safety plan). All curricula included core competencies, such as building empathic relationships, but skills like coordinating care with other professionals and working with minorities or neurodivergent populations were insufficiently covered. Barriers included cost and time constraints. Almost 40% of representatives supported province-wide standardized preinternship training for all future psychologists; another 25% disagreed, citing institutional autonomy. Standardized suicide prevention training would provide all psychologists with the skills to assess and manage individuals contemplating suicide, including a shared language with other health care professionals to facilitate coordinated care and services within the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.320
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207