Prompt-Guided Dialogue State Tracking with GPT-2 and Graph Attention
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dialogue State Tracking (DST) is a critical component of task-oriented spoken dialogue systems (SDS), tasked with maintaining an accurate representation of the conversational state by predicting slots and their corresponding values. Recent advances leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) with prompt-based tuning to improve tracking accuracy and efficiency. However, these approaches often incur substantial computational and memory overheads and typically address slot extraction implicitly within prompts, without explicitly modeling the complex dependencies between slots and values. In this work, we propose PUGG, a novel DST framework that constructs schema-driven prompts to fine-tune GPT-2 and utilizes its tokenizer to implement a memory encoder. PUGG explicitly extracts slot values via GPT-2 and employs Graph Attention Networks (GATs) to model and reason over the intricate relationships between slots and their associated values. We evaluate PUGG on four publicly available datasets, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple evaluation metrics, highlighting its robustness and generalizability in diverse conversational scenarios. Our results indicate that the integration of GPT-2 substantially reduces model complexity and memory consumption by streamlining key processes. Moreover, prompt tuning enhances the model’s flexibility and precision in extracting relevant slot-value pairs, while the incorporation of GATs facilitates effective relational reasoning, leading to improved dialogue state representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it