MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414755928 · doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.069134

Prompt-Guided Dialogue State Tracking with GPT-2 and Graph Attention

2025· article· en· W4414755928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Functions and Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionInformation Technology Research CentreMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaIran Telecommunication Research Center
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Robustness (evolution)Generalizability theoryGraphState (computer science)Flexibility (engineering)Key (lock)Component (thermodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dialogue State Tracking (DST) is a critical component of task-oriented spoken dialogue systems (SDS), tasked with maintaining an accurate representation of the conversational state by predicting slots and their corresponding values. Recent advances leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) with prompt-based tuning to improve tracking accuracy and efficiency. However, these approaches often incur substantial computational and memory overheads and typically address slot extraction implicitly within prompts, without explicitly modeling the complex dependencies between slots and values. In this work, we propose PUGG, a novel DST framework that constructs schema-driven prompts to fine-tune GPT-2 and utilizes its tokenizer to implement a memory encoder. PUGG explicitly extracts slot values via GPT-2 and employs Graph Attention Networks (GATs) to model and reason over the intricate relationships between slots and their associated values. We evaluate PUGG on four publicly available datasets, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple evaluation metrics, highlighting its robustness and generalizability in diverse conversational scenarios. Our results indicate that the integration of GPT-2 substantially reduces model complexity and memory consumption by streamlining key processes. Moreover, prompt tuning enhances the model’s flexibility and precision in extracting relevant slot-value pairs, while the incorporation of GATs facilitates effective relational reasoning, leading to improved dialogue state representations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it