MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414756848 · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.3746

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-Guided Intensification of Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy

2025· article· en· W4414756848 on OpenAlexaff
C. Belliveau, Fred Saad, Danny Duplan, Claire Petit, Guila Delouya, Daniel Taussky, Maroie Barkati, Carole Lambert, Marie-Claude Beauchemin, S. Clavel, Gary Mok, Levon Igidbashian, A.S. Gauthier-Pare, Pierre-Yves McLaughlin, Khun Visith Keu, Jean N. DaSilva, Daniel Juneau, Cynthia Ménard

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBausch Health (Canada)Public Works and Government Services CanadaCentre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de LavalHôpital Charles-Le MoyneCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstatectomyRadiation therapyProstate-specific antigenProstate cancerSalvage therapyGlutamate carboxypeptidase II

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) offers superior accuracy in detecting prostate cancer lesions leading to intensified radiotherapy (RT), but its impact on patient outcomes is still undefined. Objective: To evaluate whether intensification of salvage RT (SRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) guided by PSMA-PET (PSMAiSRT) is associated with improved failure-free survival (FFS). Design, Setting, and Participants: PSMAiSRT was a stratified cohort within a larger PSMA-guided intensification of radiotherapy (PSMAgRT) trial, a phase 2, two-center, registry-based randomized clinical trial. Patients with biochemical recurrence following RP who were eligible for standard-of-care (SOC) SRT from May 2018 to February 2021, were eligible for randomization in the PSMAiSRT stratum. A total of 130 patients were randomized, with 2 who did not proceed to radiotherapy (RT). The cutoff date for the primary analysis was October 26, 2023. Intervention: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SOC SRT to the prostate bed, with or without elective pelvic RT, with or without adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT), or PSMA-PET/CT-guided SRT, intensified to detected sites of disease. Main outcome and measures: The primary end point was FFS, defined as PSA progression (PSA nadir >0.2 ng/mL), radiological progression, next-line therapy initiation, or death. Results: Among 128 patients (median [IQR] age, 71 [64-74] years), median (range) PSA at enrollment was 0.3 (0.1-3.0) ng/mL. In the PSMAiSRT group, 33 of 64 patients (52%) received intensified SRT; with addition of pelvic RT (n = 16 [25%]), metastasis-directed RT (n = 2 [3%]), lymph node boost (n = 19 [30%]), or prostate bed boost (n = 15). Adjuvant hormone therapy was equally prevalent in both arms (55 [86%] control vs 54 [84%] PSMAiSRT). At a median (range) follow-up of 37 (7-60) months, PSMAiSRT improved FFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94; P = .04) and eugonadal FFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.96; P = .03), with its greatest benefit in the subgroup with PSA of 0.3 ng/mL or more (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.79; P = .01). Fewer next-line treatment events occurred in the PSMAiSRT arm (4 vs 12; HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-1.02; P = .04). There were no significant differences in toxic effects or quality of life between arms. Conclusion and Relevance: This phase 2 trial demonstrated an isotoxic improvement in cancer control with PSMA-PET-guided intensification of SRT after RP. Confirmatory evidence is awaited from a subsequently accrued phase 3 trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03525288.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207