Production Systems and Feeding Strategies in the Aromatic Fingerprinting of Animal-Derived Foods: Invited Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aroma and flavor are central to consumer perception, product acceptance, and market positioning of animal-derived foods such as meat, milk, and eggs. These sensory traits arise from volatile organic compounds (VOCs) formed via lipid oxidation (e.g., hexanal, nonanal), Maillard/Strecker chemistry (e.g., pyrazines, furans), thiamine degradation (e.g., 2-methyl-3-furanthiol, thiazoles), and microbial metabolism, and are modulated by species, diet, husbandry, and post-harvest processing. Despite extensive research on food volatiles, there is still no unified framework spanning meat, milk, and eggs that connects production factors with VOC pathways and links them to sensory traits and consumer behavior. This review explores how production systems, feeding strategies, and processing shape VOC profiles, creating distinct aroma "fingerprints" in meat, milk, and eggs, and assesses their value as markers of quality, authenticity, and traceability. We have also summarized the advances in analytical techniques for aroma fingerprinting, with emphasis on GC-MS, GC-IMS, and electronic-nose approaches, and discuss links between key VOCs and sensory patterns (e.g., grassy, nutty, buttery, rancid) that influence consumer perception and willingness-to-pay. These patterns reflect differences in production and processing and can support regulatory claims, provenance verification, and label integrity. In practice, such markers can help producers tailor feeding and processing for flavor outcomes, assist regulators in verifying claims such as "organic" or "free-range," and enable consumers to make informed choices. Integrating VOC profiling with production data and chemometric/machine learning pipelines can enable robust traceability tools and sensory-driven product differentiation, supporting transparent, value-added livestock products. Thus, this review integrates production variables, biochemical pathways, and analytical platforms to outline a research agenda toward standardized, transferable VOC-based tools for authentication and label integrity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".