Paola Cortellesi’s Magic Spell: Domestic Violence and Fairy-Tale Subversion in C’è ancora domani (2023)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paola Cortellesi’s C’è ancora domani (2023) portrays happiness and misery within the confines of domestic life, giving prominence to the themes of gender-based violence and women’s hope for redemption. Drawing on the tropes of neorealism, the film is centred on Delia, a working-class woman who lives under the brutal oppression of a despotic husband, on the eve of the 1946 institutional referendum that inaugurated the birth of the Italian Republic. Initially a submissive Cinderella-like character, Delia toils inside and outside the domestic walls to support her family despite relentless beatings and humiliations. By combining a close reading of key scenes with an exploration of the film’s soundscape and its reception, this essay argues that C’è ancora domani can be interpreted as a subversive fairy-tale film. The director herself drew a connection between the film and fairy tales in a speech she delivered at the Luiss Guido Carli University in Rome in January 2024, which sparked a heated debate in the Italian press on the sexist nature of classic fairy tales. The film radically questions clichéd representations of female roles, repeatedly trumping audience expectations with its revolutionary edge. This subversive power, infused with an underlying longing for hope, aligns with the transformative spirit of the fairy-tale genre. Throughout the film, Cortellesi juxtaposes scenes of domestic violence with moments of ironic levity, accentuating the chasm between Delia’s grim reality and her dreams of escape. By putting the film into conversation with fairy-tale studies, this essay ultimately interprets C’è ancora domani as a work of art that boldly subverts women’s traditional roles within the domestic space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".