MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414769976 · doi:10.1017/s003329172510192x

Associations of childhood irritability and parenting profiles with youth suicide attempt: a longitudinal person-centered approach

2025· article· en· W4414769976 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cassandra Zephirin, Marie‐Claude Geoffroy, Eszter Székely, Léa C. Perret, Michel Boivin, Richard E. Tremblay, Sylvana M. Côté, Massimiliano Orri

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychological Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaFondation de l'Hôpital général juifMinistère de l'Éducation et de l'Enseignement supérieurJewish General HospitalInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du TravailCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociauxMinistère de la SantéCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsIrritabilitySuicide preventionPoison controlInjury preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsOccupational safety and healthLongitudinal studyLongitudinal data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Childhood irritability and harsh parenting are associated with youth suicide attempts. Parents' harsh reactions have been associated with children's irritable behavior. While studies have shown individual associations of irritability and parenting behaviors with suicide risk, few have considered these factors jointly. We aimed to identify profiles of children based on irritability and parenting during childhood and examine their associations with youth suicide attempt. METHODS: = 1626) were from the Québec Longitudinal Study of Child Development. Mothers reported on childhood irritability, harsh parenting, and positive parenting between ages 3.5 and 8; youth self-reported suicide attempt between ages 13 and 23. RESULTS: We identified four profiles based on the joint development of irritability and parenting during childhood: (1) low irritability, low harsh parenting, and high positive parenting (30.3%); (2) moderate irritability, moderate harsh parenting, and high positive parenting (28.4%); (3) moderate irritability, moderate harsh parenting, and low positive parenting (26.6%); and (4) high irritability, high harsh parenting, and low positive parenting (14.8%). In logistic regression analyses, only children in the high irritability, high harsh parenting, and low positive parenting profile had higher odds of attempting suicide (OR = 2.51; 95% CI = 1.55-4.09) compared to those in the low irritability, low harsh parenting, and high positive parenting profile. This association remained significant (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.03-3.15) in models adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION: Children with chronically high irritability were also those experiencing the harshest parenting and the least positive parenting, as well as those most at risk of suicide attempt. Targeting both child and parental behavior may maximize suicide prevention efforts among children with high irritability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychological MedicineSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207