MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414773300 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1683913

The interplay between hormonal vitamin D and lipopolysaccharide signaling on human neutrophil transcriptional responses

2025· article· en· W4414773300 on OpenAlexafffund
Aiten Ismailova, Reyhaneh Salehi-Tabar, Nailya Ismailova, O Dumas, James Saliba, Volker Blank, John H. White

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University
KeywordsLipopolysaccharideCatabolismSignal transductionHormoneVitamin D and neurologyInflammationEnzymeGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Biologically active vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D or 1,25D) has emerged as a key regulator of human innate immunity. 1,25D signaling in macrophages strongly induces the expression of neutrophil chemoattractants, such as IL-8/CXCL8. Meta-analysis of vitamin D-regulated expression profiles has suggested that 1,25D may regulate granule formation in granulocytic cells. Here, we have examined the effects of 1,25D signaling on human neutrophil gene expression, alone and in combination with the inflammatory signal lipopolysaccharide (LPS). These studies are of interest because, whereas 1,25D signaling boosts innate immunity, it is anti-inflammatory. Methods and results We determined the effects of 1,25D alone and in combination with LPS on gene expression of primary human neutrophils by RNAseq. LPS did not affect or slightly enhanced the expression of several well-characterized 1,25D-target genes, but strongly suppressed that encoding the 1,25D catabolic enzyme CYP24A1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays revealed that 1,25D-dependent vitamin D receptor (VDR) binding to the major CYP24A1 enhancer was eliminated in neutrophils treated with LPS, whereas binding to other 1,25D-target genes was unaffected. Notably, LPS induced binding of transcriptional repressors MAFF and BACH1 to the major CYP24A1 enhancer region. In other studies, pathway analyses revealed that 1,25D suppressed LPS-induced genes encoding inflammatory proteins. In addition, RNAseq and confirmatory RT/qPCR studies revealed that 1,25D, both on its own and in combination with LPS, increased mRNA expression of genes encoding antimicrobial components of secretory granules, including that encoding cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP). Consistently, exposure of neutrophils to 1,25D enhanced bacterial killing, as revealed by a 20-25% reduction in E. coli colonies incubated with 1,25D-treated neutrophil conditioned media. The increased bacterial killing by 1,25D is mediated by 1,25D-induced secretion of cathelicidin, as an antibody against LL-37, the active form of cathelicidin, blocked antimicrobial activity. Discussion Collectively, the data suggest that LPS prolongs vitamin D signaling by suppressing expression of the 1,25D catabolic enzyme CYP24A1. 1,25D signaling in the presence of LPS attenuates the expression of several genes associated with LPS inflammatory responses, whereas 1,25D in the absence or presence of LPS enhances the release of antibacterial proteins secreted by neutrophils in response to infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Immunology→Same topicVitamin D Research Studies→French-language works237,207→