MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414774972 · doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003218

Modelling the climate impact of inhalers and mitigation strategies: a population-based study in British Columbia, Canada (2015–2032)

2025· article· en· W4414774972 on OpenAlexaffabout
Solmaz Setayeshgar, Kevin Liang, Valeria Stoynova, Gillian Frosst, Kate Smolina

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open Respiratory Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSafety climateGreenhouse gasDiseaseAsthmaPulmonary diseaseClimate changeBurden of diseaseDisease management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Canada has one of the highest per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with healthcare contributing ~5% of the total. Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) are significant contributors due to their use of hydrofluorocarbon propellants. While propellant-free dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and soft mist inhalers (SMIs) are available, their adoption remains limited. This population-based study evaluates inhaler dispensation trends in British Columbia (BC), Canada, projects future dispensation and emissions over the next decade, and explores mitigation strategies through pMDI substitution. METHODS: Historical inhaler dispensation data (2015-2022) from BC were analysed using negative binomial models to assess trends, project future usage and emissions (2023-2032) and evaluate four substitution scenarios replacing pMDIs with low-GHG alternatives or DPIs/SMIs. Emissions were estimated by inhaler type, sex, age and health region, with uncertainties addressed through Monte Carlo simulation for the projected values. RESULTS: An average of 2.1 million inhalers are dispensed annually in BC, with pMDIs comprising 64% of total inhaler use but contributing 98% of the ~30 000 tonnes of GHG emissions. There was regional variation and older populations contributed disproportionately, reflecting burden of disease. From 2015 to 2022 (excluding 2020 and 2021, the COVID-19 years), pMDI dispensations decreased by 1% annually while DPI/SMI dispensations increased by 5%. Projections show that, without intervention, emissions could rise to ~37 000 tonnes by 2032, varying by age group. All substitution scenarios, by replacing pMDIs with DPIs/SMIs, could reduce emissions by up to 42%. CONCLUSION: High quality, guideline-directed diagnosis and management of respiratory disease is known to improve health and reduce emissions. Building on these benefits, our analysis shows that substituting pMDIs with lower-emission inhalers, when guided by policy and clinical decisions that prioritise patient safety and preference, can significantly reduce healthcare-related GHG emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open Respiratory ResearchSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207