MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Rare Case of Titanium Elastic Nail Removal 7 Years after Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fracture Using a Screw Retriever Technique

2025· article· en· W4414775893 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manmohan Singh, Neeraj Singla, Kapil Bansal, Ganesh B. Bajaj

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImplantTitaniumBiocompatibilityFracture (geology)Nail (fastener)Labrador Retriever

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is a commonly used modality for the surgical stabilization of long-bone fractures in children, with routine implant removal recommended within 6-12 months. Delayed removal beyond this timeframe is uncommon and presents unique surgical challenges. We report a rare case of titanium elastic nails (TENs) removal performed 7 years after initial fixation, highlighting the technical considerations and successful outcome. Case Report: A 14-year-old female presented with discomfort in the left thigh. The patient had a history of TENs nails inserted at age 7 for a mid-shaft femoral fracture. The patient was lost to follow-up due to family circumstances. The patient had remained completely asymptomatic throughout the retention period with full functional recovery. Radiograph of the left thigh showed two TENs nails. Due to anticipated extraction difficulty from prolonged retention, a screw retriever technique was successfully employed for safe nail removal without complications. Conclusion: This case demonstrates the excellent biocompatibility of titanium implants and confirms that delayed TENs removal can be safely accomplished using specialized extraction techniques. The use of a screw retriever provides an effective solution for challenging implant removal scenarios while minimizing surgical morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic Case ReportsSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207