MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414778820 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17671-1

Hybrid CNN-BLSTM architecture for classification and detection of arrhythmia in ECG signals

2025· article· en· W4414778820 on OpenAlexaff
Yuguang Ye, Kavimbi Chipusu, Muhammad Awais Ashraf, Bijiao Ding, Yifeng Huang, Jianlong Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersHuaqiao UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkDeep learningSalientPattern recognition (psychology)Representation (politics)Sensitivity (control systems)Artificial neural networkActivation function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces a robust and efficient hybrid deep learning framework that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BLSTM) networks for the automated detection and classification of cardiac arrhythmias from electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. The proposed architecture leverages the complementary strengths of both components: the CNN layers autonomously learn and extract salient morphological features from raw ECG waveforms, while the BLSTM layers effectively model the sequential and temporal dependencies inherent in ECG signals, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. To further enhance training stability and non-linear representation capability, the Mish activation function is incorporated throughout the network. The model was trained and evaluated using a combination of the widely recognized MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database and de-identified clinical ECG recordings sourced from collaborating healthcare institutions, ensuring both diversity and clinical relevance of the dataset. Notably, the framework operates with minimal preprocessing, underscoring its practical viability for real-time implementation. Experimental results demonstrate the model's exceptional performance, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 99.52%, sensitivity of 99.48%, and specificity of 99.85%. These outcomes highlight the model's robustness, generalizability, and strong potential for integration into clinical decision support systems, particularly in high-throughput or resource-constrained healthcare environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207