MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414779068 · doi:10.1186/s40478-025-02120-x

Cryo-EM studies of amyloid-β fibrils from human and murine brains carrying the Uppsala APP mutation (Δ690–695)

2025· article· en· W4414779068 on OpenAlexaff
Mara Zielinski, Fernanda S. Peralta Reyes, Lothar Gremer, Simon Sommerhage, María Pagnon de la Vega, Christine Röder, Thomas Heidler, Stina Syvänen, Dieter Willbold, Dag Sehlin, Martin Ingelsson, Gunnar F. Schröder

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Neuropathologica Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteThe Wilson Centre
FundersForschungszentrum JülichAlzheimer Forschung Initiative
KeywordsFibrilMutationPoint mutationHuman brainAmyloid fibrilAmyloid (mycology)GenePeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Today, 13 intra-amyloid-β (Aβ) amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene mutations are known to cause familial Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Most of them are point mutations causing an increased production or a change in the conformation of Aβ. The Uppsala APP mutation (Δ690–695 in APP, Δ19–24 in Aβ) is the first known multi-codon deletion causing autosomal dominant AD. Here, we applied cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to investigate the structure of Aβ fibrils with the Uppsala APP mutation from tg-UppSwe mouse brain tissue. Murine AβUpp(1–42) Δ19–24 are made of two identical S-shaped protofilaments with an ordered fibril core of S8-A42. The murine Aβ fold is almost identical to previously described human type II filaments, although the amino acid sequences differ considerably. In addition, we report the cryo-EM structure of Aβ fibrils from the temporal cortex of a patient with the Uppsala APP mutation. The observed structure of the human Aβ fold closely resembles previously described type I fibrils. Structural modeling suggests that these fibrils are composed of wild-type Aβ, which implies that AβUpp may be less soluble and thus not readily accessible for cryo-EM image processing and structure determination. Additionally, from the human sample we determined the structures of tau paired helical filaments and tau straight filaments, which are identical to those found in sporadic AD cases. Finally, we present the 3D cryo-EM structures of four dominant AβUpp(1–42) Δ19–24 fibril polymorphs, formed in vitro. All four polymorphs differ from the observed folds of Uppsala Aβ in murine and human brain tissue, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Neuropathologica CommunicationsSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207