Prediction of late seizures after ischemic stroke using cognitive scores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late seizures are well-known sequelae after stroke. Previous history of stroke and dementia is common etiology of epilepsy, however, the effect of cognitive impairment on late seizures has not been fully investigated. We investigated the clinical significance of cognitive scores in predicting the occurrence of post-stroke late seizures. METHODS: Adult patients with acute cerebral infarction were analyzed. Their cognitive function was evaluated using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE)-III and the Japanese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J) within two weeks after stroke. Factors associated with late seizures and accuracy of cognitive scores to predict late seizures were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 45 patients enrolled (28 males, age 77.2 ± 8.5 years, mean ± SD), eight patients had late seizures within 123.8 ± 126.5 days after cerebral infarction. Cognitive evaluation was performed at 8.0 ± 3.9 days. ACE-III and MoCA-J scores were significantly lower in patients with late seizures than in those without late seizures (ACE-III: 27.5 ± 17.3 vs. 59.1 ± 27.2, MoCA-J: 7.6 ± 5.9 vs. 15.4 ± 8.6, p < 0.05, unpaired t-test). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that area under curve of ACE-III was larger than that of MoCA-J and size of cerebral infarction. The optimum cut-off scores of ACE-III were ≤ 58.5 (Sensitivity: 1.00, specificity: 0.62) and ≤ 45.0 (0.88, 0.73). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that each cut-off score significantly associated with late seizures. Sizes of infarcts and of cortical lesion were not significantly different between patients with and without late seizures. ROC curve and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed a significant association between size of infarct and late seizures, however, ACE-III scores more strongly associated with late seizures than the size of infarct did. CONCLUSION: Cognitive scores, especially ACE-III, within two weeks after cerebral infarction can be useful for predicting post-stroke late seizures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".