MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414780948 · doi:10.1186/s13104-025-07486-8

An accelerometer-based dataset for monitoring slag in steel manufacturing

2025· article· en· W4414780948 on OpenAlexaff
Mert Sehri, Lucas Mantuan Ayres, Francisco de Assis Boldt, Patrick Dumond, Marco Antonio de Souza Leite Cuadros

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Research Notes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlag (welding)Resource (disambiguation)Set (abstract data type)Production (economics)Steel mill

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Slag detection in steel manufacturing is essential for ensuring high product quality and process efficiency. The purpose of the accelerometer-based data is to allow for accurate monitoring and differentiation between slag and molten metal flow. This is vital to prevent equipment damage, maintain steel quality, and enhance operational effectiveness. The data is collected specifically to support the development of machine learning models for real-time monitoring in the steel production process, addressing the critical need for precise slag detection. DATA DESCRIPTION: The Steel Slag Flow Dataset (SSFD) offers a comprehensive set of data obtained from a triaxial accelerometer during various stages of steel production. By leveraging this dataset, researchers can effectively analyze and classify the flow of slag versus molten metal. The dataset allows for data-driven approaches so that machine learning researchers can optimize steel manufacturing processes, ensuring high-quality steel production and minimizing the risks associated with slag contamination. The SSFD provides a valuable resource for researchers seeking to enhance predictive maintenance and monitoring in industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Research NotesSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207