MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414781147 · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70173

Warming effects on decomposition via trophic cascades vary across elevations in an alpine meadow ecosystem

2025· article· en· W4414781147 on OpenAlexaff
Binyu Luo, Jingxue Zhao, A. Allan Degen, Mei Huang, Wenyin Wang, Tianyun Qi, Lauchlan H. Fraser, Zhen Peng, Lingyan Qi, Peipei Liu, Robert D. Holt, Zhanhuan Shang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Florida Foundation
KeywordsDetritivoreTrophic levelAbundance (ecology)Trophic cascadeEctothermEcosystemPredatorGlobal warming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Warming increases the foraging rates of ectothermic predators, potentially resulting in increased predation pressure on detritivores through top‐down effects, thereby influencing decomposition. Trophic cascade effects under warming are shaped by many factors, including temperature, precipitation and trophic structure. Greater species diversity may weaken these cascades through intensified interspecific interactions and, in turn, shape how decomposition responds to warming (the vertical diversity hypothesis), but this process has seldom been examined in natural ecosystems. Here, we experimentally increased warming at three elevations (4650, 4950 and 5200 m) in an alpine meadow ecosystem to test the predator‐mediated effects of warming on decomposition, as well as the role of arthropod diversity in these processes. Among the three elevations, arthropod diversity and predator abundance were significantly greater at 4950 m than at 4650 and 5200 m. Warming increased predator abundance at all three elevations, but decreased detritivore abundance only at 4650 and 5200 m. Detritivore abundances at 4650 and 5200 m, but not at 4950 m, were correlated negatively with predator abundance under experimental warming. Based on multigroup structural equation models, warming primarily reduced litter decomposition directly during the cold season when arthropod activity was limited. In contrast, during the warm season and over the whole year, both periods with greater arthropod activity, warming predominantly reduced litter decomposition via predator‐driven top‐down effects, rather than through direct effects. Although warming increased predator abundance across all elevations, the resulting trophic cascade was observed only at 4650 and 5200 m, where elevated predator abundance suppressed detritivores and reduced litter decomposition. In network analysis, indicators of arthropod diversity had the most correlations with indicators of ecosystem function, suggesting that the warming‐driven decline in detritivore abundance could influence ecosystem functionality negatively. Synthesis: We conclude that warming‐induced increases in predator abundance can reduce detritivores and decomposition through strong top‐down effects, but these effects appear confined to elevations with low arthropod diversity. Our study provides a novel perspective on the factors shaping decomposition responses to warming. Large‐scale field studies and mesocosm‐based experiments are warranted to assess the generality of this effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EcologySame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207