Phylogenomic placement and morphological description of a novel phagotrophic euglenid from Hawaii: <i>Hokulea waialensis</i> n. gen. et sp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Euglenids are a diverse group of flagellated protists that include phagotrophic, osmotrophic, and phototrophic lineages. Understanding the phylogenetic relationships of phagotrophic euglenids is crucial in understanding euglenid evolution as a whole. Yet many relationships within euglenids remain unclear, and further resolution requires extensive sampling, particularly from the deep-branching, paraphyletic group known as ‘ploeotids’. Improved resolution of evolutionary relationships among ploeotid taxa is necessary to elucidate the origin and diversification of complex ultrastructural traits (e.g., pellicle, feeding apparatus). Here, we isolated, cultivated and characterized a novel ‘ploeotid’ species named Hokulea waialensis n. gen. et sp. using light and scanning electron microscopy, single-cell sequencing, and phylogenomic analyses. This new species is relatively small (10-12 µm long) compared to related euglenids, and shares several morphological traits with related species of Alistosa. Both single and multigene phylogenetic reconstructions from single amplified genome data show that Hokulea waialensis n. gen. et sp. is closely related to several environmental small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequences, and more broadly to Lentomona s and Decastava .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".