MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414792411 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.112

P01.32.B A RECURRENT SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE MUTATION IN TBR1 PROMOTES STEMNESS IN GROUP 4 MEDULLOBLASTOMA

2025· article· en· W4414792411 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Livingston, Kelsey M. Hennick, Andrew Erickson, Tomasz J. Nowakowski, Jane McGlade, Michael D. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsMedulloblastomaTranscriptomeTranscription factorMutantCerebellumPhenotypeDownregulation and upregulationMutationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common pediatric brain cancer. It arises from the rhombic lip, the germinal zone for the glutamatergic cells of the cerebellum. A unique single-nucleotide mutation (pG275C) in T-box Brain 1 (TBR1), a key transcription factor in neuronal development, is recurrent in the most common subgroup of MB, group 4. The function of this mutation is unknown, but the specificity of the mutation, and increased expression of TBR1 in TBR1G275C tumours, suggest a gain of function. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using bulk transcriptomic data on over 300 group 4 MB tumours, we identify differentially expressed genes (DEG), and leverage published single cell transcriptomic datasets of the developing human cerebellum to situate expression of these DEG in development. To identify changes in TBR1G275C’s DNA binding sites we perform ChIP-seq in a TBR1G275C patient tumour sample and in a TBR1WT group 4 MB sample. To observe phenotypic effects of TBR1G275C, we generate cortical organoids from human iPSCs edited with CRISPR-Cas9 to harbour a homozygous TBR1G275C mutation. Organoids are fixed and stained for markers of neural stemness and differentiation. Performing Co-IP experiments on differentially tagged TBR1 proteins, we investigate the mechanisms behind observed effects of the mutation. RESULTS Analysis of bulk transcriptomic data shows that upregulated genes in TBR1G275C tumours map to the most stem-like compartment of the cerebellar rhombic lip. ChIP-seq reveals changes in the preferred DNA binding sites of TBR1G275C, with the mutant protein binding the promoters of genes which are developmentally regulated by HES family transcription factors, downstream effectors of Notch signalling that maintain stemness in neural development. TBR1G275C cortical organoids exhibit an increase in SOX2+ stem cell rosettes. Co-IP reveals an increase in TBR1 homodimerization caused by the G275C mutation. CONCLUSION These data support a model in which the TBR1G275C mutation increases the stem cell population of group 4 MBs by changing the transcriptional targets of TBR1, potentially through alterations in its dimerization behaviour. Properties of stemness such as self renewal capacity are important to a cancer’s ability to replicate indefinitely, metastasize, and evade traditional therapies, and this project will lead to an increased understanding of the ways in which group 4 MB can achieve these properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4040.132

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→