MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414792733 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.444

P13.03.B MCM2 HIGHLIGHTS A SUBSET OF AGGRESSIVE MENINGIOMAS WITH ENHANCED PROLIFERATION

2025· article· en· W4414792733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Taijun Hana, Chiaki Murakami, Shunya Hanakita, Morihiro Higashi, Soichi Oya

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunohistochemistryTranscriptomeMeningiomaCell cycleCellGeneIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND While most meningiomas are benign with favorable outcomes, a subset demonstrates high proliferative capacity and follows a lethal clinical course. To predict the postoperative behavior of meningiomas and refine our treatment strategy, we focused on minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (MCM2), a marker of cell proliferation, and investigated the clinical and molecular differences between tumors with high versus low MCM2 immunohistochemical positivity. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed MCM2 immunohistochemistry on surgical specimens from 36 patients with meningiomas treated at our institution with tumor resection followed by radiotherapy. Cases were dichotomized into MCM2-high and MCM2-low groups based on a 35% positivity cutoff, and progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between groups. In addition, RNA sequencing was conducted in 14 selected cases to assess differences in gene expression profiles between the groups. These findings were validated using public transcriptomic data from the Meningioma (University of Toronto, Nature 2021) cohort. Furthermore, ultrastructural analysis was performed using electron microscopy on high-grade meningioma tissues to investigate intracellular features associated with aggressive behavior. RESULTS The MCM2-high group showed significantly shorter PFS compared to the low group (p < 0.0001), indicating a poorer prognosis. MCM2 mRNA levels were significantly higher in the high group (p = 0.000127), and genes related to cell division and cell cycle regulation were also upregulated. These transcriptomic trends were consistent with findings from the public dataset. These results suggest that elevated MCM2 expression reflects enhanced proliferative activity and contributes to poor clinical outcomes. Additionally, electron microscopy revealed abundant morphologically abnormal mitochondria in high-grade tumors, implying a cancer-like metabolic phenotype. CONCLUSION High MCM2 positivity serves as a surrogate marker for increased mitotic activity and poor prognosis in meningiomas. Moreover, energy metabolism in high-grade meningiomas may align with that of malignant tumors, highlighting a potential therapeutic target. SUPPORT This study was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant (25K18859).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207