MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The main directions of emigration of mountain Jews in the second half of the XX – early XXI century

2025· article· en· W4414796697 on OpenAlex
Rustam Zeinalabidovich Isaev, Magomed Gasanov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenesis исторические исследования · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationHarmony (color)Context (archaeology)Human settlementSettlement (finance)The RepublicMass migration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article explores the main directions of emigration of mountain Jews in the second half of the XX – early XXI century. Mountain Jews, Caucasian Jews or Juurs, or to be more precise, their ancestors appeared in the Caucasus, presumably in the VI century A.D. The territories of the modern Republic of Azerbaijan and the south of the Republic of Dagestan became the places of their compact settlement in this region. Mountain Jews have always lived in harmony and peace with other peoples in the Caucasus. The situation changed in the 1970s when they began to repatriate to Israel. However, the resettlement movement became more widespread in the 1990s during the disintegration of the USSR. The author analyzes the reasons for the mass exodus of representatives of this community, including political, economic and social factors. Special attention is paid to migration routes, such as moving to Israel, the USA and Europe, as well as the peculiarities of adaptation of mountain Jews in new conditions. The paper examines changes in cultural identity and the preservation of traditions in the context of the diaspora. Among the methods used in this study are the historical method (historical-genetic), historical-comparative method, historical-typological method, historical-structural method, documentary analysis. The study combines historical and sociological aspects of the emigration of mountain Jews, which allows for a more complete understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. The article presents statistical data that were not previously taken into account in research on this topic. New migration routes and links with diasporas are analyzed, which actualizes the problem of identity and cultural adaptation. The influence of political and economic changes in the countries of origin and admission on the dynamics of emigration is investigated. Conclusions: 1. The emigration of mountain Jews in the second half of the 20th century was mainly caused by political and economic difficulties, and at the beginning of the 21st century by the search for better living conditions and integration into new societies. 2. The main areas of emigration are Israel, the USA, Canada, Germany and Austria, where mountain Jews have found an opportunity to maintain their culture and identity. 3. The emigration process had a significant impact on the demographic structure, which led, in fact, to the disappearance of communities of mountain Jews in traditional places of residence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it