MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414797459 · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae0f38

HPGe-Compton Net: a physics-guided CNN for fast gamma spectra analysis via Compton region learning

2025· article· en· W4414797459 on OpenAlexafffund
Yanfeng Xie, Soo Hyun Byun

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Learning Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsDetectorConvolutional neural networkSemiconductor detectorData setCompton scatteringFeature (linguistics)Gamma spectroscopyArtificial neural networkRadioactive waste

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors have been golden standard for gamma spectrometry in low-level radioactive waste (LLW) analysis; however, their notable shortcoming is prolonged measurement durations for weak radioactive waste materials. The present study aimed to develop the HPGe-Compton Net, a 1D physics-guided convolutional neural network to accelerate LLW analysis by taking advantage of the entire response function of a HPGe detector for each radionuclide of interest, in contrast to the traditional methods that analyze only peak regions of the response. This acceleration is supported by two core innovative strategies: (a) channel-prompt method, a feature enhancement incorporating additional physical information to guide the model to locate the designated radionuclide; (b) the specially designed database to achieve effective targeted feature learning. The performance evaluation carried out for test data set showed a five times reduction in measurement time compared to a conventional spectral analysis method while maintaining comparable precision. Compton perturbation tests confirmed the model’s ‘smart’ adaptive utilization of the Compton regions. The generalization testing of four LLW samples as the external validation set proved its superior performance in low-count data with an average accuracy of 90% over 83% of the traditional method. Future work will focus on upgrading the HPGe-Compton Net for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMachine Learning Science and TechnologySame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207