MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leveraging Information Systems for the Conservation of the Niki de Saint Phalle’s Tarot Garden Artistic Legacy

2025· article· en· W4414798149 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Santana Quintero, Elyse Hamp, D. Aiello, Flavia Perugini, Luigi Barazzetti

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)Cultural heritageInformation systemGeographic information systemSculptureSAINTWorkflowDocumentationWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. This paper presents a Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based digital framework developed to support the long-term conservation of the Tarot Garden (Il Giardino dei Tarocchi), a monumental sculpture garden in Italy created by French-American artist Niki de Saint Phalle. While GIS is widely recognized as a powerful tool for organizing and analyzing heritage data, this paper emphasizes that its complexity can limit its accessibility and effectiveness in conservation planning. To address this, the project prioritized stakeholder usability, data interoperability, and capacity building. The work was conducted by the Carleton Immersive Media Studio (CIMS) in collaboration with the Getty Conservation Institute (GCI), the Niki Charitable Art Foundation, and the Tarot Garden Foundation, under the GCI’s Modern and Contemporary Art Research Initiative (ModCon). The initiative produced a suite of digital assets – including ortho-rectified images, measured drawings, and a photographic record portfolio – integrated into a GIS platform. Developed through an interdisciplinary approach involving conservators, documentation specialists, and site stakeholders, the system supports condition monitoring, comparative analysis, and evidence-based decision-making. By embedding digital tools into conservation workflows and training local staff in their use, the project fosters sustainable stewardship and helps preserve both the tangible and intangible heritage of the Tarot Garden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesSame topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207