Focus on Arctic amplification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Anthropogenic climate change has a disproportionate effect on the Arctic, with the Arctic warming at approximately 2–4 times the rate of the global average, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification. The greater rate of warming in the Arctic is not only having profound local effects on ecosystems and Indigenous and other communities in the far North, but may also be causing remote effects on weather and climate at lower latitudes. While much has been learned about the climate feedbacks that drive Arctic amplification in response to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, there remain outstanding questions about the evolution of and interactions between climate feedbacks, the relative roles of different climate forcings and feedbacks and local versus remote processes. This focus collection includes 17 articles which contribute novel research findings on (1) the mechanisms driving Arctic amplification with new insights into the time-dependent nature of Arctic amplification and feedback interactions, (2) Arctic amplification across a wide range of CO 2 and non-CO 2 forcings and (3) new approaches to assessing the climate response of amplified Arctic warming and the role of sea ice loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".