MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414805048 · doi:10.1016/j.metop.2025.100403

Maternal and cord blood lipidomics as predictors of autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review

2025· review· en· W4414805048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antigoni Sarantaki, Ali Ghanchi, Joeri Vermeulen, Anastasia Barbouni, Aikaterini Sousamli, Dimitrios Anagnostopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueMetabolism Open · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutismLipidomicsCord bloodAutism spectrum disorderProspective cohort studyPregnancyUmbilical cordAssociation (psychology)Longitudinal study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Lipid metabolism is integral to neurodevelopment, contributing to neuronal membrane integrity, myelination, and signaling processes. Recent evidence indicates that disruptions in maternal and perinatal lipidomic profiles may be linked to an increased risk of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). To date, no systematic review has synthesized findings from human cohort studies examining lipidomic biomarkers during pregnancy or at birth in relation to subsequent ASD development. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and grey literature sources from inception to September 2025 for studies assessing maternal lipidomics during pregnancy, postpartum lipid profiles, or cord/neonatal lipidomics in relation to ASD diagnoses or autistic traits measured in offspring. Eligible study designs included prospective cohorts and nested case-control studies. Data extraction followed a standardized template, and methodological quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Findings were synthesized narratively given heterogeneity in biospecimen timing, lipidomic platforms, and outcome measures. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251152074). Results: Nine prospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Maternal lipidomics during pregnancy indicated that lower ω-3 to ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratios and deficiencies in docosahexaenoic acid were associated with increased autistic traits or ASD with intellectual disability. Postpartum maternal lipid profiles showed that low low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol predicted greater ASD risk. Cord blood and neonatal lipidomics implicated acylcarnitines, sphingomyelins, and arachidonic acid-derived oxylipins in later ASD symptoms, with some studies demonstrating moderate predictive accuracy (AUROC ranging from 0.71 to 0.85) using machine learning approaches. Overall, recurrent disturbances in fatty acid metabolism, mitochondrial β-oxidation, and inflammatory lipid mediators were observed. Conclusions: Prospective evidence supports an association between maternal and neonatal lipidomic alterations and ASD risk, suggesting potential early biomarkers. However, heterogeneity across studies and reliance on single-timepoint measures limit comparability. Standardized lipidomic protocols, longitudinal sampling, and replication in diverse cohorts are needed to establish clinical utility and inform prevention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetabolism OpenSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207