Pendekatan Tata Ruang dalam Pengendalian Daerah Sempadan Sungai sebagai Area Resapan Banjir di Desa Beleka Lombok Tengah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beleka Village, located in Central Lombok Regency, is an area with a high vulnerability to flood disasters, particularly around the riverbank buffer zones. This issue is exacerbated by land-use changes and the low public awareness of the importance of maintaining the ecological function of riverbank areas as water infiltration zones. This community service activity aims to educate the public and provide adaptive and sustainable spatial planning recommendations as part of flood control efforts. The approach used is participatory, involving outreach activities, participatory mapping, and focus group discussions (FGDs) with residents, community leaders, and village government officials. The results of the activity show that spatial planning approaches can improve community understanding of the strategic function of riverbanks and encourage the formation of local agreements to protect and rehabilitate these areas as conservation and flood infiltration zones. In addition, a draft spatial utilization plan was produced, based on disaster mitigation principles that integrate local wisdom and ecological aspects. This activity highlights the importance of synergy between scientific approaches and community participation in sustainable spatial management at the village level. It is hoped that this initiative can serve as a replicable model for other villages facing similar challenges, particularly in the context of flood control through spatial planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".