MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414809555 · doi:10.1016/j.polar.2025.101287

Optimizing the use of portable ROVs for community-based benthic surveys: A case study on the demographics of sea cucumbers around nursery habitats in the Arctic

2025· article· en· W4414809555 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lauren E. Gover, Jean‐François Hamel, Annie Mercier

Bibliographic record

VenuePolar Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEchinoderm biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersWorld Wildlife Fund CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsGovernment of NunavutPolar Knowledge Canada
KeywordsBenthic zoneQuadratRemotely operated underwater vehicleHabitatRubbleArcticBenthosDemographicsBathymetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nearshore areas around Qikiqtait in the Canadian Arctic have been identified as nursery habitats for the sea cucumber Cucumaria frondosa , which is locally consumed and being explored for small-scale commercial fisheries. This study characterized this species’ demographics along a depth gradient (∼0.5–11.5 m) at three sites inside and adjacent to nursery grounds using a mini-class remotely operated vehicle (ROV). A novel technique involving the superimposition of virtual quadrats was developed to minimize perspective biases for the analysis of images captured obliquely relative to the seafloor. Overall densities at Katak and Kataaluk were a magnitude lower than at Sanikiluaq, suggesting spatial variability in environmental conditions. Smaller individuals (∼5 cm) occurred mostly on rubble between 1–3 m at Sanikiluaq, larger ones (∼10 cm) on gravel at 2–7 m at Kataaluk, and a mix of both size classes occupied gravel, rubble, boulders, and bedrock between 3–11 m at Katak. Globally, body sizes tended to increase with depth, evoking cohorts of sea cucumbers undergoing step-wise downward migrations as they grew. This study provides foundational data on C. frondosa around its nursery habitats. It also enhances the usefulness of mini-class ROVs to investigate benthic assemblages in ice-covered areas through community-led initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolar ScienceSame topicEchinoderm biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207