MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414830608 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf300.622

PSVII-6 Comparative fatty acid profiling of Australian White and F1 Australian White × Rideau muscle.

2025· article· en· W4414830608 on OpenAlexaff
Thaís Correia Costa, Mariana Mescouto Lopes, Emily Knapper, Z Li, Mariana Gastaldo, Walmir da Silva, Lucas L Verado, Nick V. L. Serão, Márcio de Souza Duarte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurebredFatty acidCrossbreedPolyunsaturated fatty acidBreedIntramuscular fatOleic acidPalmitic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The meat from Australian White (AW) sheep is known by its excellent eating quality, due to increased marbling, and a fatty acid profile high in long chain omega-3 fatty acids, which are associated with cardiovascular health and brain function in humans. Rideau Arcott is a dam-line breed characterized by enhanced prolificacy, good body conformation and growth rates. Crossbreeding can be a promising strategy to combine desirable traits of both breeds while mitigating the high costs of maintaining purebred herds. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the intramuscular fat (IMF) characteristics and fatty acid profile of purebred AW and AW x Rideau F1 lambs (F1R). Samples from the Longissimus dorsiof 20 AW and 20 F1R lambs were collected at slaughter to analyze the IMF content, fat melting point (FMP), and the fatty acid profile. Results revealed that F1R lambs exhibited lower FMP and higher total fatty acids, including saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids, compared to AW lambs (P ≤ 0.05). Additionally, the increase in IMF (%) had a quadratic effect (P≤ 0.05) on total SFA, MUFA, and PUFA concentrations in F1R lambs, peaking at 2.0–2.5% IMF, whereas in AW lambs, these values increased linearly with IMF (%). Among the SFAs, capric (C10:0), myristic (C14:0), palmitic (C16:0), and stearic acid (C18:0) concentrations were higher (P ≤ 0.05) in F1R lambs. Similarly, greater concentrations of palmitoleic (C16:1), oleic (C18:1), and eicosenoic acid (C20:1), classified as MUFAs, were found in F1R lambs. For PUFAs, total omega-3 and omega-6 concentrations were higher (P ≤ 0.05) in F1R than in AW lambs. Specifically, linoleic (C18:2N6), α-linolenic (C18:3N3), and γ-linolenic acid (C18:3N6) were more abundant in F1R lambs, while arachidonic acid (C20:4N6) was lower (P ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, crossbreeding AW with Rideau Arcott sheep resulted in F1 lambs with lower FMP, which may be favorable in sensory characteristics of the meat, such as juiciness and flavor. Moreover, the differences in FMP between breeds may be due to higher concentrations of both MUFAs and PUFAs, including key omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in F1R meat. These characteristics contribute to a favorable fatty acid profile that potentially improves meat quality and aligns consumers’ preferences for nutritionally superior meat products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207