MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414830628 · doi:10.1177/20543581251359736

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of a CKD-Specific Virtual Monitoring Platform to Minimize Adverse Outcomes in High-Risk CKD Patients: A Clinical Research Protocol

2025· article· en· W4414830628 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Zahra Solati, Paul Komenda, Navdeep Tangri, Clara Bohm, Thomas W. Ferguson, Drew Hager, Bryce Barr, Priyanka Mysore, Ingrid Hougen, Alejandro Meraz-Muñoz, Arsh K. Jain, Paul Tam, Claudio Rigatto

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of ManitobaSeven Oaks General Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialProtocol (science)Adverse effectClinical trialClinical researchKidney diseaseResearch design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The transition from advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) to dialysis is a period of heightened vulnerability for many patients. Virtual monitoring of these patients could facilitate the communication of accurate and reliable data between patients and health care providers, helping to avoid unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits and facilitate more optimal dialysis starts. Objective: To determine whether the addition of the VIEWER (Virtual Ward Incorporating Electronic Wearables) platform to usual care will lead to a reduction in ED visits and hospitalizations and lead to an increase in perceived safety of virtual care among patients and providers. Design: This study is a national, pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing usual care alone vs usual care plus the VIEWER virtual care platform in patients with advanced CKD. Given the nature of the intervention, patients and care providers will not be blinded; outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be blinded. Setting: Five CKD clinics in 2 Canadian provinces (Manitoba and Ontario). Participants: , 2-year kidney failure risk >40%). Measurements: saturation, step count) and weekly Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r) survey. These assessments will be integrated into clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary kidney health clinics. Participants will use the VIEWER platform for 12 months (or until dialysis initiation) in addition to receiving usual care. Methods: Intention-to-treat (ITT) approach will be used to compare the primary outcome between 2 study groups. Time to primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed using univariate Cox proportional hazards models and a Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test. The primary outcome is the time to first hospital admission and/or ED visit. The control is usual care (no exposure to VIEWER platform). Limitations: Some individuals may face challenges with technology adoption, which could affect participation. Those without Internet access are limited in their ability to take part in this study. Conclusions: This study will help determine whether virtual monitoring in advanced CKD patients can reduce ED visits and hospitalization. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT05726526.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→