MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414830714 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf300.416

PSIII-22 Good vaccine practices influence immune priming against Bovine viral diarrhea virus in beef calves.

2025· article· en· W4414830714 on OpenAlexaff
Vanesa Ramirez Sepulveda, Gleise da Silva, Timothy Schwinghamer, Hee‐Eun Yang, Nilusha Malmuthuge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaccinationBooster doseTiterBooster (rocketry)Antibody titerImmunityAntibodyVaccine efficacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Good vaccine practices (GVPs) contribute to successful vaccination programs. However, GVPs are underemphasized by vaccination programs for beef cattle. Therefore, this study quantified the effects of GVPs on priming protective immunity against respiratory pathogens. Beef calves (~205 days of age, n = 150) were randomly assigned to five groups at booster vaccination before weaning. Four groups received a commercial 5-way modified-live vaccine against PI3, BRSV, IBR, BVDV1, and BVDV2 as follows: vaccine prepared an hour before vaccination and stored in a cooler (SC, n = 34); vaccine prepared one hour before vaccination and stored at room temperature (SRT, n = 34); vaccine prepared six hours before vaccination and stored in a cooler (LC, n = 34); vaccine prepared six hours before vaccination and stored at room temperature (LRT, n = 34); and one group received no vaccines (control, n = 14). Blood samples from the experimental calves were collected before and four weeks after booster vaccination to assess antibody titers and cortisol levels. Data were analyzed using a generalized and a linear mixed model as well as a logistic regression. Experimental treatment group mean cortisol levels were not statistically significantly different (p = 0.13) pre- or post-vaccination. Booster vaccination increased (p < 0.01) antibody titers and virus neutralization against viral pathogens, compared to pre-vaccination, regardless of the GVP. Antibody titers to IBR were affected by the storage method of the prepared vaccine, regardless of the vaccine mixing time and sampling time, whereas viral neutralization (VN) titers against BVDV2 were affected by vaccine mixing time, regardless of sampling time or storage method. VN titers against BVDV1 were affected by the two-way interaction of vaccine mixing time-by-storage method of the prepared vaccine: the LRT group mean of BVDV1 titer was less than that of the SRT calves (p = 0.02). The number of calves immune-primed against BVDV1 decreased by 89% (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.71; p = 0.05) and BVDV2 decreased by 86% (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-0.89; p = 0.08) in the LRT group compared to SC group. The results motivate the conclusion that immune priming was not influenced by variations in stress-induced immune suppression among the treated calves, but the impact of GVPs varied based on the pathogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207