MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414830772 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf300.692

PSX-25 In situ ruminal degradation of feedstuffs in beef cattle fed finishing diets with varying starch levels.

2025· article· en· W4414830772 on OpenAlexaff
A. L. Rigueiro, Alírio De Carvalho, Robson Dinardi, Gabriela Fogaça, C.C. Carvalho, Jéssica Gusmão, Renan Santos, Gabriel O Ribeiro, M. C. Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenLatin squareBagasseStarchSorghumDry matterBeef cattleFactorial experiment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two in situ trials were conducted to investigate the ruminal degradability of sugarcane bagasse, corn, and sorghum in beef cattle fed finishing diets with varying starch levels. Four ruminally cannulated Nellore steers (494.8±55.9 kg) were housed in individual pens (21 m²). In Trial 1, steers were assigned to a replicated 2×2 Latin square design, following a 2×2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Steers were fed two starch levels [22.5% vs. 45.0% of diet dry matter (DM)] and two sugarcane bagasse sources [fresh vs. aged (1 year old)], which were incubated in the rumen for 48, 72, and 120-h. Sugarcane bagasse was incubated from days 9 to 14 of each experimental period, to evaluate DM and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) degradation. In trial 2, steers were assigned to a replicated 2×2 Latin square design, following a 2×2×2 factorial arrangement of treatments, including two starch levels (22.5% vs. 45.0% of the diet DM), two-grain types (corn vs. sorghum), and two-grain processing methods (ensiled reconstituted high-moisture vs. dry-rolled), which were incubated in the rumen for 7 hours. Corn and sorghum were incubated on day 14 of each experimental period to evaluate DM and starch degradation. Each period lasted 21 days. All dried samples were ground to pass a 2-mm screen, and 1.5 grams were weighed in triplicate into nylon bags (50-μm) and inserted into the ventral rumen in a mesh laundry bag in reverse order. In trial 1, aged sugarcane bagasse had greater DM (P=0.03) and NDF (P=0.05) degradability than fresh bagasse. Bagasse incubated for 120-h had greater DM (P < 0.01) and NDF (P < 0.01) degradability, 72-h was intermediate, and 48-h had lower ruminal degradability. In trial 2, corn had greater (P < 0.01) ruminal degradation of DM and starch than sorghum. High-moisture grain had greater (P≤0.04) ruminal degradation of DM and starch than dry-rolled. At low starch levels, corn had greater (interaction, P=0.05) ruminal starch degradation than sorghum, while corn and sorghum at high starch levels were intermediate but not different. High-moisture had greater (interaction, P≤0.05) ruminal degradation of starch at both high and low starch levels compared to dry-rolled. High-moisture corn and sorghum had greater (interaction, P < 0.05) ruminal DM and starch degradation than their dry processing. In conclusion, diet starch levels did not affect DM, NDF, or starch in situ ruminal degradability of sugarcane bagasse, corn and sorghum. Aged sugarcane bagasse had greater ruminal degradability than fresh bagasse. Corn demonstrated greater ruminal degradability of DM and starch than sorghum when steers where fed diets low in starch. High-moisture improved in situ DM and starch degradation of both grain types when compared to dry processing. These findings highlight the influence of ingredient type, and processing method on ruminal degradability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockFrench-language works237,207