MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414831287 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf300.159

189 Effect of milk replacer and grower diet composition on intake, growth and body composition in Holstein-Angus crossbred calves from birth to the end of the growing phase.

2025· article· en· W4414831287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactoseRumpCrossbreedWeaningComposition (language)Intramuscular fatRandomized block design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The number of crossbred dairy calves has drastically increased over the past decade, but pre-feedlot nutritional recommendations remain scarce. This study investigated the interaction between pre- and post-weaning diets with different energy substrate inclusions. Male Holstein-Angus calves (n = 68) were assigned at 1 wk of age to 1 of 4 treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: fat milk replacer (MR) + control grower diet (FC); fat MR + fat grower diet (FF); lactose MR + fat grower diet (LF); and lactose MR + control grower diet (LC). Fat and lactose MR were 29% and 18% fat, and 38% and 51% lactose (DM), respectively. Mixing rate for fat and lactose MR were 135 and 150 g/l, respectively to balance energy and protein supply. Milk replacer was fed at 15% of arrival body weight (BW) until wk 3 and 18% thereafter until wk 6. Gradual weaning occurred from wk 6 to 10, with grower diets introduced at wk 5 and fed until the end of the growing phase (wk 36). Fat and control grower diets were 7% and 3% crude fat (DM), respectively. At wk 13, calves were transported to a feedlot for the remainder of the experiment. Milk and solid feed intake were recorded daily, and BW was collected weekly. Starting on wk 16, measurements of the ribeye area (REA), back and rump fat thickness, and intramuscular fat (IMF) percentage were taken monthly using ultrasound on the Longissimus dorsi muscle. Analysis of variance was conducted using treatment and calf nested in block as fixed and random effects, respectively. Milk composition had no effect on BW or average daily gain (ADG), though calves fed fat MR had greater milk intake for the first 2 wks (P = 0.01). Calves fed the control grower diet had increased solid feed intake (P = 0.02) and tended to have greater ADG (P = 0.10), leading to a greater BW at wk 36 of age and a larger REA (P = 0.05) compared to calves fed the fat grower diet. Rump fat depots tended to be higher in calves fed the high lactose MR (P = 0.06) and the control grower (P = 0.07), whereas IMF was greater in LC-fed calves compared to FC-fed calves (P = 0.05). Overall, calves fed the fat grower diet had higher feed efficiency (kg DMI / kg BW gain) than calves fed the control grower (P < 0.01). Milk replacer composition had limited effects on growth when fed at isocaloric and isonitrogenous levels. However, growth, body composition and feed efficiency were affected by the type of energy substrate in the grower diet. Whether these differences persist in the finishing phase remains to be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it