Production of Synbiotic Raspberry Jam with Inulin Content and Lactic Acid Bacteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inulin consists of unabsorbed fructans that increase absorption of calcium in addition to probiotic nature. pH, acidity, reducing sugars, brix and viability (survival) of probiotic bacteria in Synbiotic Raspberry jam produced by inulin content (0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%) and two bacteria of Lactobacillus (L.) casei and L. acidophilus (1.5×108 cfu/ml) have been examined during storage of treatments for four weeks. During four weeks of storage, pH level was reduced in synbiotic raspberry jam; rate of acidity was increased; and quantities of reducing sugars and brix were decreased. Due to consuming sugar and existing nutrients in fruit, number of probiotic bacteria was reduced during period of storage of treatments. The level of viability of probiotics varied within range (106 – 107 cfu/ml) for all treatments during four storage weeks. N3M1 treatment (1.5% of inulin and 108 cfu/ml L. casei) comprised of the highest viability rate in probiotics and it was introduced as premier treatment. Taste sensitivity assessment during first and fourth weeks of storage, N1M1 treatment (0.5% inulin with incubation of 108 cfu/ml of L. casei) possessed the highest score and N3M2 treatment (1.5% of inulin with incubation of 108 cfu/ml of L. acidophilus) obtained the lowest score among all of treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".