MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414833553 · doi:10.26907/esd.20.3.06

Future Transformations in Teacher Education in Serbia from Three Different Angles

2025· article· en· W4414833553 on OpenAlex
Branka Radulović

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation & Self Development · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Law, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Teacher educationInstitutionInvestment (military)Focus (optics)Human capital

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investment in human capital is becoming an increasingly important issue for the economic growth of any country. Accordingly, the teacher takes on the role of a reformer because he directly influences the formation of young people as future experts. However, unlike technological and thus social changes, educational changes happen slowly because they need to be viewed from the perspective of creators (higher education institution – HEI), collaborators (mentor teacher in schools) and consumers (students – future teachers). Therefore, the goal of this research is oriented towards looking at the directions of future transformations of teacher education in Serbia, precisely from these three angles. A total of 32 respondents participated in the research (10 teachers from HEI, 9 mentor teachers, and 13 future teachers and beginning teachers-mentee). A questionnaire consisting of 10 questions was used to obtain the results. The results show that all respondents identified the main challenges in the current system of education for future teachers as related to motivation for the teaching profession, a clear education strategy for the coming period, and social status. Key areas that need to be transformed in the next decade are related to increasing mentee competencies required by the complexity of the 21 st century classroom. More specifically, respondents stated that the areas should not undergo a complete transformation, but rather that there should be an increased focus on the specific demands of modern society. Accordingly, the focus should be on student-centered approaches, inclusive, enhanced by technology, with an emphasis on interdisciplinary. The research identified a number of challenges that should be considered before embarking on the transformation of future teacher education. Some of the challenges are: insufficient investment in educational infrastructure, discrepancies in curricula, and sluggishness in following modern trends and innovations. Therefore, the first step proposed is defining professional standards and qualification standards that would be based on the empirical results of all previous reforms, in order to take advantage of the inertia of the system to systematically introduce changes and systematically prepare teachers for better and more inclusive support for mentee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it