MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414846079 · doi:10.61838/mhlj.3.4.7

Predicting Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms Based on Childhood Trauma and Alexithymia With the Mediating Role of Mentalization in University Students

2025· article· en· W4414846079 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zahra Shirazi, Mansooreh Fazilati

Bibliographic record

VenueMental Health and Lifestyle Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorderline personality disorderAlexithymiaMentalizationPersonalitySadistic personality disorderPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aimed to predict borderline personality disorder (BPD) based on childhood trauma and alexithymia, with the mediating role of mentalization in university students. This study employed a descriptive correlational design. The statistical population included male and female students from three branches of the Islamic Azad University: Tehran Central (Sardar Soleimani Complex, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences), Tehran West (Payambar Azam Complex, Faculty of Architecture and Art), and Shahre Qods (Faculty of Engineering). These branches were selected from among all branches of the Islamic Azad University in Tehran during the 2024–2025 academic year. The sample size was determined to be 300 participants based on the method proposed by Kline (1990), and they were selected through a non-random convenience sampling method. Data were collected using the Jackson and Claridge Borderline Personality Scale (1991), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire by Bernstein and Fink (2003), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (1985), and the Mentalization Scale by Fonagy et al. (2016). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 28 and AMOS version 24. The results of data analysis showed that childhood trauma had a standardized coefficient of 0.175 on borderline personality disorder and the direction of the effect was positive. Additionally, alexithymia had a standardized coefficient of 0.334 on borderline personality disorder and the direction of the effect was positive. Furthermore, childhood trauma had no significant effect on borderline personality disorder through the mediating role of mentalization (p = 0.358). However, alexithymia had a significant effect on borderline personality disorder through the mediating role of mentalization (p = 0.016). Finally, the empirical model demonstrated acceptable and appropriate fit, and the overall model was confirmed. Childhood trauma and alexithymia play important roles in the emergence of borderline personality disorder symptoms, and mentalization served as a mediator only in the relationship between alexithymia and borderline personality disorder. These findings highlight the necessity of incorporating emotion regulation training and strengthening mentalization skills in preventive and therapeutic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMental Health and Lifestyle JournalSame topicPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyFrench-language works237,207