Penggunaan Media Flashcard dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun Di Kelompok Bermain Kenanga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flashcard media is a learning medium designed to optimize early childhood learning experiences through multisensory stimulation. This study aims to determine the use of flashcard media to improve the cognitive abilities of early childhood-aged children (5-6 years) in Kober Kenanga and to assess the extent of the impact of using flashcard media on the development of cognitive abilities in early childhood-aged children (5-6 years) in Kober Kenanga. The method employed in this study is qualitative under a phenomenological approach. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach with a phenomenological approach. In this study, the researchers act as the teacher assisted by other two teachers to conduct the learning on 15 early childhoods aged 5-6 years who are selected as the population and sample in this study. The results show that the use of flashcard media occurs well, at which 11 early childhoods (73.3%) are able to remember, understand, and match the alphabet A-Z, with the criteria developing of according to expectations (BSH). Meanwhile, the rest of the 4 early childhoods (26.7%) are still experiencing obstacles, with the criteria not yet developing (BB). Furthermore, when the use of flashcard media is combined with the singing method and the drilling technique, the results show that the entire 15 early childhoods (100%) can remember, understand, and match the letters of the alphabet A with the available symbols and images, with the criteria of developing very well (BSB).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".