MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414851431 · doi:10.1038/s43856-025-01121-0

Integrating direct electrical stimulation with brain connectivity predicts lesion-induced language impairment and recovery

2025· article· en· W4414851431 on OpenAlexaff
Ludovico Coletta, Paolo Avesani, Luca Zigiotto, Martina Venturini, Luciano Annicchiarico, Laura Vavassori, Sharna D. Jamadar, Emma X Liang, Justine Y. Hansen, Bratislav Mišić, Sam Ng, Hugues Duffau, Silvio Sarubbo

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research Council
KeywordsCognitionBrain stimulationCognitive impairmentWork (physics)Electrical brain stimulationAphasiaNeuroimagingElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurological conditions account for millions of deaths per year and induce long-lasting cognitive impairments. The disruption of structural brain networks predicts the emergence of cognitive impairments in stroke cases, but the role of the white matter in modeling longitudinal behavioral trajectories in glioma patients is understudied. We analyzed 486 intracranial brain stimulations from 297 patients (age range 37–40, male ratio 53–64% depending on the functional categories) along with functional and structural brain connectivity data from over 1750 healthy individuals, to create a network mapping method able to identify the neural substrate causally involved in language production. We tested the validity of our procedure by (i) quantifying the spatial correspondence between white matter metabolic and hemodynamic spontaneous activity, measured via resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose functional Positron Emission Tomography (respectively); (ii) predicting unseen intracranial stimulations points; (iii) modeling the severity of stroke-induced aphasia (n = 105) and the longitudinal recovery of language abilities in glioma patients (n = 42, 3 timepoints). We show that spontaneous white matter hemodynamic oscillations map into metabolic fluctuations. We also demonstrate that the integration of patient-specific intracranial stimulation points and normative human connectivity data (i) is predictive of unseen stimulation points; (ii) provides better estimates than total lesion volume in predicting the severity of stroke-induced aphasia symptoms; (iii) models post-operative language recovery trajectories better than state-of-the-art clinical measures in glioma patients. This work presents a data-driven and neurobiologically grounded tool for modeling cognitive and neurological impairments in terms of network disruption, demonstrating improved precision over existing approaches. Coletta et al. integrate patient-specific intracranial stimulations in the white matter with normative brain connectivity data. Findings reveal that intracranial driven network mapping is an accurate predictor of both neurological impairments in stroke patients and post-operative language recovery trajectories in glioma patients. Understanding how connections in the brain can affect the recovery of language skills after stroke or surgery for brain tumors is of critical importance. Here, we developed a method that combines non-invasive brain scans with direct brain stimulation to identify the exact brain connections important for language production. Our findings reveal a brain map that could predict the severity of language problems after a stroke and how well people recovered their language skills following surgery for brain tumors, better than traditional ways of predicting language problems. We created an effective way to predict and track language difficulties caused by damage in the brain. This could help doctors plan better treatments and support for people recovering from brain injuries or surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications MedicineSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207