8291190 Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and cardiovascular disease mortality among nuclear power plant workers in the Canadian national dose registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Findings from epidemiological studies suggest that low- to moderate ionizing radiation doses increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the effects of lower doses, experienced in occupational settings, and of chronic exposures on CVD risks require further investigation. We examined the association between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the risk of CVD mortality among Canadian nuclear power plant (NPP) workers. Methods We assembled a retrospective cohort of 98,735 NPP workers from the Canadian National Dose Registry employed from 1961 onwards. Mortality was ascertained via record linkage to national vital statistics data through 2020. International Classification of Disease rubrics were used to classify CVD deaths based on the underlying cause of death. Whole-body dose measurements came from workplace personal monitoring. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were estimated to compare the mortality experience of the NPP workers to the age-, sex- and calendar year-specific Canadian general population. Poisson regression and linear excess relative risk (ERR) models, adjusted for attained age, sex, and calendar period, were used for internal dose-response analyses. Results The mean whole-body lifetime accumulated exposure was 9.63mSv (SD=28.5). A total of 2,345 deaths from circulatory disease were identified during the follow-up, and of these, 1,440 and 340 were from ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, respectively. Compared to the general population, NPP workers had lower mortality rates with SMRs of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.73, 0.80), 0.78 (95%CI: 0.74, 0.82), and 0.79 (95%CI: 0.71, 0.88) for circulatory, ischemic heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease mortality, respectively. For cardiovascular disease (circulatory diseases excluding cerebrovascular disease), the ERR/100mSv was -0.16 (95%CI: -0.28, -0.04). Conclusion Our findings suggest that contemporary levels of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation do not increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality, but our results should be interpreted cautiously due to possible biases related to uncontrolled confounding and under-ascertainment of mortality. Funding This project was funded by Conexus Nuclear Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".