Rapid Diagnostic Stewardship and Blood Culture Use in a Pediatric Medical Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: A national shortage of blood culture bottles affected approximately half of US hospitals, necessitating changes in blood culture practices. Objective: To determine the association between restrictive blood culture stewardship measures and patient outcomes at a pediatric hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was performed to determine the association between new restrictive stewardship measures and blood culture practices in a quaternary care pediatric medical center from July 1, 2023, to January 31, 2025. All children with blood cultures collected were included. Exposures: The following restrictive measures were enacted: (1) a 48-hour restriction on all aerobic blood cultures, (2) a 7-day restriction on all anaerobic blood cultures, (3) authorization to order an additional aerobic blood culture every 7 days, and (4) pooling of all central vein catheter lumens in 1 blood culture bottle. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the monthly blood culture positivity rate, stratified and normalized per 100 emergency department (ED) visits and per 100 patient-days. Results: During the study period, a total of 18 132 blood cultures from 5063 patient visits (median [IQR] age, 5.6 [1.1-12.4] years; 2744 [54.2%] male; 358 [7.15%] Black, 3013 [58.5%] Latino/a/x/Hispanic, and 720 [14.2%] White patients) were collected from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024 (preintervention period), and 6449 blood cultures from 2495 patient visits (1391 [55.8%] male, median [IQR] age; 5.5 [1.1-12.5] years; 191 [7.7%] Black, 1452 [58.2%] Latino/a/x/Hispanic, and 375 [15.0%] White patients) were collected from August 1, 2024, to January 31, 2025 (postintervention period). Restrictive stewardship measures were associated with a significant decrease in the blood culture collection rate per 100 ED visits (cumulative change, -24.1%; 95% CI, -38.4% to -8.9%; P = .01) and per 100 patient-days (cumulative change, -45.8%; 95% CI, -64.7% to -26.9%; P < .001). In the ED and inpatient units, the blood culture positivity rate remained stable, with a 14.4% (95% CI, -23.1% to 52.0%) and 27.8% (95% CI, -13.7% to 69.3%) cumulative increase, respectively. There was no significant change in hospital mortality due to septic shock (0.13% vs 0.15%) or mean length of stay (5.4 days vs 6.4 days), but there was a significant decrease in readmissions (3.3 vs 2.7; cumulative change, -27.5%; 95% CI, -7.6% to -47.6%; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: The implementation of restrictive blood culture measures, including pooling lumens and decreasing testing cadence, successfully reduced blood cultures collected without decreasing blood culture positivity rates and without an increase in mortality secondary to septic shock, readmission rates, or length of stay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".