MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414871387 · doi:10.1109/tase.2025.3618582

Toward Indirect Data-Driven Predictive Control for Heating Phase of Thermoforming Process

2025· article· en· W4414871387 on OpenAlexafffund
Hadi Hosseinionari, Mohammad Bajelani, Klaske van Heusden, Abbas S. Milani, Rudolf Seethaler

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModel predictive controlThermoformingOverheating (electricity)Overshoot (microwave communication)Control theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Parametric statisticsTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shaping thermoplastic sheets into three-dimensional products is challenging since overheating results in failed manufactured parts and wasted material. To this end, we propose an indirect data-driven predictive control approach using Model Predictive Control capable of handling temperature constraints and heating-power saturation while delivering enhanced precision and overshoot control compared to state-of-the-art methods. We employ a Non-linear Auto-Regressive with Exogenous inputs model, which is linearized to define a linear control-oriented model at each operating point. Using a high-fidelity simulator, several simulation studies have been conducted to evaluate the proposed method’s robustness and performance under parametric uncertainty, indicating overshoot and average steady-state error less than 2°C and 0.9°C (7°C and 2°C) for the nominal (worst-case) scenario. Finally, we applied the proposed method to a lab-scale thermoforming platform, resulting in a close response to the simulation analysis with overshoot and average steady-state error metrics of 5.3°C and 1°C, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207