Films about the Holodomor in the Struggle of Media Narratives: the Emotional Way of Experiencing Trauma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this article is to analyze the key narratives surrounding the Holodomor of 1932–1933 as represented in Ukrainian cinema and in films of a similar nature produced in Poland and Canada. Methods: The research employs content analysis as a systematic method for objectively describing media messages, alongside analysis, comparison, synthesis, and narrative analysis. Results. The study explores the confrontation between two opposing narratives: the Soviet and Russian narrative, which denies the existence of an artificial famine and genocide, and the Ukrainian narrative, which exposes the trauma of this historical period and the subsequent experience of its suppression and denial. These narratives function as ideological constructs, amplified through the media and integrated into feature films, which serve as a powerful tool for shaping historical understanding and national identity. The article also examines the narrative of concealment, embedded in the construction of the Soviet simulacrum of a new society, and the specific interplay between documentary and artistic elements in films about the Holodomor. The study reveals that films about the Holodomor are perceived in Ukrainian national consciousness through the lens of experienced collective trauma. This trauma is intensified by long-term suppression and denial, as well as renewed aggression. The renewed portrayal of the enemy as foreign and aggressive is shown to be central to the societal process of coping with this trauma. Novelty: This research offers a comparative perspective on how the Holodomor is portrayed across Ukrainian, Polish, and Canadian films. It highlights how cinematic narratives contribute to shaping national memory and the emotional experience of historical trauma. Practical significance. The results will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms of building national memory through cinema, as well as the development of educational and outreach programs based on cinema. Key words: famine, genocide, narrative, cinema, trauma, propaganda, memory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".