MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414885856 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf382

Mild cognitive dysfunction in hereditary spastic paraplegia 4 disease related to fluorodesoxyglucose cerebral positron emission tomography

2025· article· en· W4414885856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raphaël Miroglio, Armand Hocquel, Jean‐Marie Ravel, Guillemette Clément, Salomé Puisieux, Mylène Meyer, Laura Lavigne, Céline Dillier, Liang Liao, Emmanuelle Schmitt, Lucie Hopes, Maud Michaud, S. Pittion‐Vouyovitch, Laëtitia Lambert, Marine Guillaud-Bataille, Guillaume Banneau, Carine Bossenmeyer‐Pourié, Céline Bonnet, Antoine Verger, Mathilde Renaud

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHereditary spastic paraplegiaPopulationCognitive declineCognitionNeuropsychologyDementiaMemory spanNeuropsychological assessmentVerbal memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia type 4 (SPG4, SPAST gene) is commonly described as a pure phenotype, with progressive spastic weakness of the lower limbs. Some cognitive disorders have been reported but remain difficult to characterize. Brain flurodesoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET is a sensitive biomarker of glycolytic metabolism and shows loss of neuronal activity. Our objective was to describe the cognitive impairment of SPG4 patients, supported by brain 18F-FDG PET, to characterize the cognitive pattern and its localization. Twenty subjects from the Grand Est region, with a pathogenic variant in the SPAST gene, were included. Each patient had to undergo a neuropsychological assessment, a brain 18F-FDG PET scan, and a SPATAX-EuroSpa clinical assessment, including the Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS). Brain 18F-FDG PET was analyzed semiquantitatively after comparison with age and sex-matched control subjects. The study population was 65% (13/20) female, with an average age of 50 years (19–75 years). The median SPRS was 15/52 (12–45). Forty-six percent (7/15) of patients had a deficient Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score (score <26) without any severe impairment (score <10). Assessments with a pathological score of <1.65 standard deviations or at the 5th percentile included verbal episodic memory in 16-item Free and Cued Recall Test (16-FCRT; 63%, 10/16), facial emotion recognition (56%, 9/16), and executive functions (Trail Making Test A and B; 47%, 7/15; the Stroop; 47%, 7/15; digit span of Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale 4; 38%, 6/16). Compared with those of control subjects, 18-FDG PET images of the brains of SPG4 subjects revealed frontotemporal and precuneus hypometabolism, principally in the prefrontal cortex, which was mainly mesial (P voxel value <0.001, corrected for the size of the familywise error (FWE) cluster, k = 1464). Frontal hypometabolism was correlated with age at onset (k = −0.475, P = 0.046) and the time to perform the Trail Making Test B test (k = −0.597, P = 0.019). Here, we describe a mild cognitive disorder clinically in SPG4 patients, associated with an hypometabolism on 18F-FDG PET imaging, which mainly corresponded to frontotemporal localization. Mild cognitive dysfunction should be screened in SPG4, as it can have a significant impact on socioprofessional life. Brain 18F-FDG PET, combined with neuropsychological assessment appears to be a good screening and follow-up examination for cognitive disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207