MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improving timely access and patient-centered outcomes for oncology patients in rural Colorado.

2025· article· en· W4414893345 on OpenAlexaff
Erica Schwab

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Oncology Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Canadian institutionsDillon Consulting
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialPalliative careAdvance care planningHealth careChartMEDLINEHome healthRural area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

326 Background: Rural populations face substantial barriers in accessing home health, palliative, and end-of-life care, especially among medically complex patients. Geographic isolation, limited transportation, provider shortages, and insufficient in-home care infrastructure contribute to delayed or absent services, poor health outcomes, and caregiver burden. A retrospective chart review of home care and hospice referrals at a rural Colorado hospital (May 2019–May 2020) found that 24% of referred patients experienced care delays or received no care at all. In response to these findings, Vail Health developed Shaw at Home, a three-year pilot program aimed at improving access to in-home palliative care, increasing completion of advance care planning (ACP) documents, and enhancing patient and caregiver experience. Methods: To inform program design, a 2021 chart review of oncology patients at Vail Health Shaw Cancer Center (VHSCC) found that 62% (n=427) had stage III or IV cancer, for which national guidelines recommend palliative care referral. Based on this identified need, Shaw at Home was launched in June 2023. The interdisciplinary program provides symptom management, ACP, psychosocial support, and care coordination in home and clinic settings. Services are delivered by an advanced practice provider, nurse, chaplain, and clinical social worker. The program initially targeted 100 patients in its first year with 5% projected annual growth. Metrics tracked include ACP completion, visit volume, and patient experience. Results: Since June 2023, Shaw at Home has served 143 unique patients with over 1500 encounters. Advance Care Planning (ACP) document completion increased from 12% pre-implementation to 53%, indicating stronger engagement in care planning. Patient experience, assessed using the RAND Serious Illness Survey for Community-Based Care, showed high levels of satisfaction, communication, and care coordination and exceeded national benchmarks. These outcomes demonstrate the program’s effectiveness in delivering accessible and patient-centered palliative care in the community. Conclusions: Initial findings indicate that Shaw at Home addresses key gaps in rural palliative care, improving timely access and patient-centered outcomes for oncology patients. The model demonstrates feasibility and impact in underserved mountain communities and offers a scalable framework for extending palliative care in similar rural settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCO Oncology PracticeSame topicEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerFrench-language works237,207