MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414896639 · doi:10.3390/jcm14197080

Influence of Preoperative Depression on Pain, Function, and Complications After Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4414896639 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Iosafat Pinto, Panagiotis Konstantinou, Lazaros Kostretzis, Tryfon Ditsios, Chrysanthos Chrysanthou, Anastasios P Nikolaides, Stylianos Kapetanakis, Κωνσταντίνος Δίτσιος

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)CINAHLPsychosocialAnkleMeta-analysisMEDLINECohort studyRandomized controlled trialProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Depression has been identified as an important determinant of outcomes in hip and knee arthroplasty, but its impact on total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains unclear. Given the growing use of TAA as a treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis, understanding psychosocial risk factors is critical for optimizing surgical outcomes. This study aims to assess the effect of preoperative depression on clinical and functional outcomes following total ankle arthroplasty. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched through August 2025 for studies reporting outcomes of TAA stratified by depression status. Eligible designs included randomized trials, cohort studies and case series. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Given heterogeneity in study designs, depression definitions, and outcome measures, findings were synthesized narratively and summarized using a revised effect-direction plot. Results: Six unique studies involving approximately 9000 patients met inclusion criteria. Five studies were rated as good quality on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, while one study was judged to be of moderate quality. Four studies assessing pain outcomes consistently demonstrated worse postoperative pain or less improvement in patients with depression. Three of five studies assessing functional or disability outcomes reported reduced improvement, while two studies found no independent association. Two studies evaluating complications showed higher risks of adverse events, including prolonged hospital stay, non-home discharge, osteophytosis, and implant subsidence, among depressed patients. Revised effect-direction synthesis confirmed a consistent trend toward poorer outcomes across pain, function, and complication domains. Conclusions: Depression is associated with worse pain and higher complication rates following TAA, while its influence on functional recovery was not demonstrated uniformly. These findings support the importance of routine preoperative screening and targeted management of depression. Further prospective, multicenter studies and interventional trials are needed to clarify causality and optimize perioperative care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.008
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MedicineSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207